The COVID-19 crisis has brought death, economic destruction and wrenching social change. As a combination of post-illness immunity and rising vaccinations begins to suppress the pandemic, we’re going to feel a powerful impulse to put as much of this horrendous experience as possible behind us.

As well we should. But some effects of COVID-19 aren’t going away. They represent long-term consequences, positive and negative, to which North Carolinians will have to adjust. A recent grant by the John William Pope Foundation, a Raleigh-based grantmaker for which I serve as president, will help facilitate precisely the sort of adjustment I mean.

First, though, some background. Among the negative consequences of the pandemic has been to intensify a crisis in mental health. About one in five North Carolinians suffers from at least a mild mental illness. They often don’t pursue a diagnosis of their condition, and most receive no treatment for it.

The COVID-19 crisis — produced both by the disease itself and the effects of policy responses intended to contain it — have made the situation much worse. Many North Carolinians have become isolated, physically and psychologically, making it harder to handle the deaths of relatives or friends, the loss of jobs and businesses, and, for young people, the loss of in-person schooling.

According to the nonprofit National Alliance on Mental Illness North Carolina (NAMI-NC), rates of depression and anxiety are up as much as threefold since the pandemic began. Some of these cases will produce self-harm, even suicide. Many will produce large social and economic costs. All will produce suffering. And for many, these negative effects will long outlast the pandemic.

At the same time that COVID-19 has worsened our mental health, however, it has also accustomed many more North Carolinians to technological innovations such as telehealth, teleconferencing and remote work that can help.

The ways our medical providers deliver health screenings, information and treatment, for example, have been forever altered and expanded. Telehealth will continue to extend expertise and affordable care to patients who live in remote locations or are otherwise unable or unwilling to come into physical offices.

Now consider the implications of working from home. Even after vaccination is widespread, some employers and employees are going to stick with an arrangement that, perhaps to their surprise, has proved to be not only flexible and economical but also a boost to productivity. According to some studies, we may see a permanent doubling or tripling of work-at-home rates. For some North Carolinians with mental illnesses, this option could be a godsend.

Adjusting to these changes won’t be easy, however. While producing significant gains in the long run, they’ll require expenditures of time and money in the short run. They’ll require thinking about problems in a different way, and trying out a variety of solutions.

When my colleagues and I at the John William Pope Foundation created our Joy Pope Memorial Grant program some years ago, one of our goals was to encourage this kind of innovative thinking. Every year the program awards up to $100,000 to nonprofits delivering human services in North Carolina, plus a similar amount to arts and cultural organizations in our state.

NAMI-NC is one of our Pope Memorial Grant recipients for 2021. Our $50,000 award will allow the nonprofit to create a state-of-the-art media center. This will make possible a variety of new services and functions, such as advising patients and their families on how to access medical care, hosting support groups by smart phone for North Carolinians who wouldn’t otherwise seek help, and organizing health providers and educators to respond effectively to rising suicide rates among our youth.

North Carolina has a rich ecosystem of nonprofits that treat the sick, train the jobless, feed and clothe the destitute, shelter the homeless, and comfort the forlorn. The past year has both strained their capacity and proved their worth. Many are now “going the distance,” investing in new technologies and facilities to meet post-COVID-19 needs. Donors and volunteers should come alongside to help.

Recommended for you

John Hood is president of the Pope Foundation and author of the forthcoming novel Mountain Folk, a historical fantasy set during the American Revolution (

(2) comments


This opinion piece highlights an important issue concerning charitable giving by wealthy individuals and their foundations. But what could possibly be wrong with giving money to a good cause? First let’s look at where the money in this article is coming from. This is but a small taste of the convoluted incestuousness of the common corporate boardroom: John Hood serves as president of the J. W. Pope Foundation as he states in the article. He also sits on the board of the John Locke Foundation, which was founded by the heir to that same Pope family fortune, Art Pope. Art is also the Chairman of the WI based Bradley Foundation, which provides around 80% of John Locke Foundation’s annual funding. Besides the obviousness of John Hood writing a feel-good puff piece about the foundation he serves as president, Hood’s primary intention is to lend credence to the idea that philanthropy is more effective and important than policy change and social benefit spending by the State.

John Hood proudly displays his financial support for the National Alliance on Mental Illness through foundation grants. Look up NAMI, however, and you will see that they champion legislative changes that are in direct opposition to John Hood, Art Pope, and the John Locke Foundation’s neoliberal agenda: NAMI supports expansion of affordable healthcare, Medicaid, and Medicare (with no work requirement), diverting police involvement in mental health issues (a.k.a. defund the police), and funding public school mental health programs (no mention of vouchers or school choice here).

It is a well-known secret that the Pope family spends enough money in NC to single-handedly guide the agenda of the state’s Republican Party. So instead of giving an occasional singular grant to non-profits, why not use the totality of political capital these foundations have amassed to make powerful, significant, and lasting changes to local infrastructure? Because Hood, and other toadies for conservative kingmakers in our state want only to gain the appearance of paternal generosity. They don’t want progress. Their actual positions are anti-populist and anti-democratic. While they encourage the working class to live and die by the invisible hand of “free” markets, they offset negative public perception with highly visible gifts. They know these grants are largely ineffectual — or else they wouldn’t freely give to contrarian causes.

The ultimate goal of neoliberal think-tanks is to reduce opportunities for democratic participation. They preach about over-reliance on government while enforcing total reliance on corporate will and superficial generosity. By maintaining financial anxiety amongst wage laborers, they hope to make us swallow any bitter pill presented by our employers — choice is an illusion when there are no options. Hood and the John Locke Foundation have purposefully corrupted terms so dear to our American hearts: freedom, liberty, innovation, etc. What they peddle is anything but.


Excellent break-down. Thanks for sharing!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.