Texas is the latest state to have a big fight over reforming its election laws. Remember that in Georgia, some Democrats — such as President Joe Biden — said a Republican-passed law that made several commonsense changes to election practices was “Jim Crow on steroids.” You won’t be surprised that some Democrats are saying similar things about a bill that would make changes — Republicans call them commonsense changes — in Texas.

But this time, state Democrats have dramatically raised the stakes. On May 31, Democratic lawmakers walked out of the Texas House of Representatives. Realizing they were headed to defeat at the hands of majority Republicans, Democrats fled the House, which they knew would mean there would not be a quorum of lawmakers present in the House, which would mean proceedings could not continue. House action stopped. The election-reform bill, known as SB7, was dead.

But only for now. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott immediately said he would add the bill to a special session to finish the work. It will eventually pass. But some Democrats celebrated their party’s move to throw a roadblock in the way of the legislature. Julian Castro, the former HUD secretary from Texas, saw it as part of a larger Democratic move to kill the filibuster in the Senate and pass the Democrats’ national voting bill.

“Texas Democrats have officially blocked the Republican voter suppression bill and spared us time to act,” Castro tweeted in the wee hours of Monday morning. “NOW is the time for the U.S. Senate to end the filibuster and safeguard our democracy before it’s too late.”

Maybe Castro didn’t notice, but the irony was overwhelming. The Democrats in Washington who want to kill the filibuster say they’re doing it because the filibuster allows the minority — Republicans — to thwart the will of majority Democrats. Leave aside that the Senate is evenly divided, 50-50, and it is only the tiebreaking vote of Vice President Kamala Harris that gives them the most tenuous of majorities. Democrats say they are sick of a minority being able to frustrate the majority.

What are Democrats doing in Texas? As the minority unable to outvote majority Republicans, they have walked out of the House to frustrate the will of the majority. They have exercised what is sometimes called a “walking filibuster.” And some of them are doing it even as they encourage Washington Democrats to get rid of the filibuster.

By the way, the Texas Democrats’ tactics are nothing new. Back in 2003, when Republicans had just won a majority in the Texas House and set about work on redistricting, Democrats actually fled the state to deny the GOP a quorum to continue the work. They didn’t just leave the building, they left the state. Then-Gov. Rick Perry called a special session, and Democrats left the state again, gathering in New Mexico. A standoff ensued. But the majority finally won.

And many will recall 2011 in Wisconsin, when Democratic lawmakers fled the state trying to stop then-Gov. Scott Walker’s budget reforms. On top of that, an angry mob breached the capitol building in Madison, overwhelming police and leading to a long period of chaos and paralysis. Just as in Texas, the majority eventually prevailed. Now there is a new standoff in Texas. And one last thing: What is it all about? The Republican bill would, among other things, outlaw 24-hour voting and drive-thru voting in Texas. Are those long-lived election traditions in Texas that Republicans are suddenly trying to kill? Not at all. They were enacted by one county — Harris County, home of Houston — last year in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Republicans reasonably believe that 1.) the policies would be impractical statewide, and 2.) election procedures, set by the legislature, should be consistent throughout the state.

And now, with Democrats protesting and fleeing the House, Republicans ask: Is anyone really saying this is somehow the new Jim Crow? Seriously? It will take a while, but just as in Georgia, Republicans will pass the new law. And just as in Georgia, many people in Texas and around the country will wonder what the screaming was about.

Recommended for you

Byron York is chief political correspondent for The Washington Examiner.

(1) comment

thechaosaysmuuuu

Because apparently the WD feels the need to post this trash more than once and in different forms, I too, will double-post:

Watauga Democrat: How can you in good conscience keep posting such inflammatory garbage, but *on the same exact day* put out a piece whining about how badly we need to come together. Y'all are only helping to further the divide by publishing this kind of incendiary trash. For the sake of maybe one day engaging in actual journalism: take some time to reflect! York unsurprisingly completely avoids mentioning when the GOP did *the same exact thing* (only worse, as they did it repeatedly) in Oregon a couple years ago. Outright refusing to even enter gvt. buildings and thus refusing to do the job taxpayers are paying them to do. Not because they were protesting anti-democratic legislation, as in the case of Texas, but because they feel that any legislation which seeks to: protect the environment, fight climate change, put some semblance of controls around guns, etc. is a personal attack on their very selves, and being the toddlers that they are, they prefer to simply run and hide (quite literally in Oregon, by the way) rather than debate. Funny how York never bothered to put out an Op-Ed when the GOP did far worse, and more often, but has no problems with calling out Dems when they're attempting to thwart anti-democratic legislation. Oh how the Republicans have allowed themselves to fall so far, so fast is truly, breathtakingly pathetic. Though I guess they're really just showing everyone their true colors now.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.